![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCwgLquJ2gaQvL4IDl9buW7b24sFMX2RsNRIPTEiQqUDgAJ2cqJ4YuoVcBUXWFMoetWf7iZW5APIBOxbkqZbau4MC7qkwfF9q1SjFI26-RVQ2ajMg8_1ML7a_GkoKq8w4STOTqzNix7YHM/s320/hillary-clinton.jpg)
McCain yesterday vowed that he would bring the troops home from Iraq “with honor and victory,” while, he said, Obama prefers forfeiture. Does McCain think the war is an Olympic event? What is “victory?” Didn’t we achieve victory 24 hours after invading the country in 2003? What is forfeiture? Returning a sovereign country to its rightful owners? I cannot fathom how his mind works when he talks like that.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyC2i4LahPBYOqCnHwwojbZ4X-7Tvm8AUHlv7vihxx_K5ToT6LD_RTJLu-FBiAcrc9RTt2WtHAnTINilEQiLVqKbBs2w9fYlC_7ZphB1RRmGM9TBYXynnKqG0Fhd-SOgU6HcwPpbZOX9Kj/s320/john-mccain.jpg)
Of course voters have not read McCain’s Foreign Affairs article, or much of anything else either, and that’s the problem. Obama may be too far out in front of the crowd to be a natural leader. You can’t lead from a mountaintop; only from five paces ahead. And maybe Hillary was that leader. Maybe I was wrong about her. I have a long history of being a contrary indicator.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgr0FF6xJHWuo6IB9rDiW2ikfqVpZwyR0RX0X6C7o2cVgK1Ade1vjLArmn415zZyXS538ghLojLvLL-El1rPHh9X_4RXIZkj5LI26w6W1idhuluWavjUx5JKrFY86MJVHgQAYfwR4RT7j9-/s320/obama-points.jpg)
It may be that Hillary was right insisting that she was the “electable” candidate. Looking back at the primaries now, where she won big, she may have been right.
I still believe Obama would be a president of a higher order, like this country has not seen in two or three generations; while another self-obsessed Clinton White House would be excruciating and dangerous for America. But the first step in the recipe for making rabbit stew is 1: Catch a rabbit.
No comments:
Post a Comment